Purists will say ‘Never! human error is part of the game’.
The problem is that technology can show us otherwise. Cricket umpires can be corrected by technology that traces the ball’s trajectory and says whether it was going to hit the wickets or not. The game can continue its natural course because a better decision is available.
Statistics, visual indicators of ball trajectories, tracking of a single player through dedicated cameras, split screens, slow motion replays of line calls, text to big screen, mobile companion applications and alternative commentaries – they are all part of the modern sports entertainment package.
And I don’t mind paying for it.
The benefits
- We feel closer to the action
- We become more knowledgeable about the sport
- We get value from a well-rounded productAND
- We feel cheated when we see replay after replay of a bad decision that cannot be reversed
It throws the rest of the match from that point into a haze of contestability – epsecially when the match is a close affair and the result would have been different.
Sports entertainment costs money. Professional rugby in New Zealand wouldn’t exist without Television rights and match tickets are expensive for the world’s premier rugby event.
I was at the Cake Tin in Wellington for the Wales v Springbok first round match last night.
The rain had stopped, the ground was in good nick and 30,000+ turned out for the first game in the capital.
For the record I am no hater of Wayne Barnes I think the guy is quite a good ref (http://craprefs.com/international-rugby/470/).
I also think that apart from the big one, he had a good game.
One (far from objective) barometer of how a referee is doing is how conscious you are of him being there and I wasn’t particularly conscious of Wayne Barnes last night.
The game flowed nicely, teams were given the opportunity to compete with the ball at the breakdown, indescretions were penalised and both teams generally adhered to the way things were being managed.
There was consistency.
(Although Barnes could have referred to the TMB) It was linesmen Vinny Munro and George Clancy whole ruled on the kick.
I also liked the way that Wayne Barnes did not use his whistle to establish control.
Contrast Barnes performance with that of New Zealand’s Bryce Lawrence who gave his whistle a real working over in England’s opening match against Argentina in Dunedin on Saturday.
Lawrence seems to get personal, finding fault in a great many aspects of one team’s play for periods of time.
[I thought England cheated a bit and credit where it's due, Courtney Lawes tackle wasn't late and the knee shot was probably not obvious at first glance]
Even Allain Rouland – normally very chilled in the hot seat – seemed keen to get the cobwebs out of his whistle when he refereed the Australia v Italy tussle on Sunday.
Anyway, back to the dilemma of getting something so significant, so wrong.
Where there is so much at stake, there has got to be a way to rectify bad calls.
What is the TMO doing during the match if not looking at footage?
If a kick at goal looks close, it should be reviewed. If the game is a bog one (club semi-final, final, world cup match), there should be additional technology available to assist. The kind of technology that is used in cricket, baseball and yaughting to track trajectories.
If something like a kick at goal has been wrongly denied, then they should correct it, award points accordingly and let everybody know at the next break in play.
This is what happens in cricket when a mistake is uncovered. A shot is given 4 instead of 6, the matter is discovered and the scoreboard is changed and all parties notified.
Why is rugby so slow to adapt?
The real cost
- An agonising 1 point loss instead of an historic 2 point victory
- A place in the World Cup semi-final
It will probably be the difference between facing Australia or Ireland in a quarter final.
If you are going to make so much money out of a rugby competition then bloody-well spend some of it on getting things like this right.
Tags: George Clancy, Vinny Munro, Wayne Barnes
Posted in Rugby World Cup 2011 | 1 Comment »